• Professor Elam

    Next Monday February 23, Tony Ridout and Tamara Black will visit our Intermediate Accounting Class.
    Ridout Barrett CPAs
    are located in the same building at San Antonio CPA Society on the North 410 Loop just west of Nacogdoches. Click on the hyperlink to learn more about the firm and what they do. One of our San Antonio A & M alums works for this firm.  The Managing Partner and  Human Resources are taking their time to come to our campus to help the class learn more about opportunities for accountants in San Antonio.  So as I said in class, be prepared with constructive questions regarding the San Antonio business environment.

    Thanks to these accounting professionals for finding time in their day to share insights with us.

  • Professor Elam

    This semester I have urged students to become engaged in their studies. The quote above comes from Mike Phelps swim coach, ie, if you want to become a great swimmer, exercise, running, lifting weights are all good but finally, the sooner you get in the water the better.

    Our next assignments in Ethics (which were all on the original syllabus by the way) are on historic figures and contemporary ethical conflicts. Yet half the students had yet to pick an historic figure for their report.

    Semper paratus, Always Prepared, the phrase is as old as the Roman Empire.  One should always have an 'after dinner' speech at ready. One never knows when the opportunity to perform or if you will 'show off' your talent will arise.

    One might peruse history.com or biography.com on the net for ideas.

  • Professor Elam

    John Stossel

    talks common sense in this column. The Egyptians created a lot of 'jobs' in building pyramids but did the pyramids create any wealth?  Remember that multiplier effect?  I doubt it, they are still sitting there attracting a few tourists yes but not to the benefit of those that built them thousands of years ago. 
    Will the stimulus bill create any wealth or are we just filling holes?  You tell me!

    points out that there are a myriad of relationships in the economy. The idea that a czar can make those decisions him or herself is delusional. After all consider the post office does it run as well as Fed Ex, they just raised stamp prices, a lot, in a recession, thanks. Any layoffs planned there in the USPS now that we all have virtually free electronic mail, I have not heard of any. Yet every company in America seems to be laying people off. But USPS is raising prices and keeping everyone, and to think they criticize GM….
  • Professor Elam

    President Obama is in Denver today, Speaker Pelosi is on an 8 day trip to Italy, Secy State Hillary is in Asia, Geithner is in Europe or some other place

    so I guess GM is not high on their priority list.  Apprently GM and Chrysler will submit their written plans on re organizing after the markets close today.  And that will be taken under consideration by the Feds.  I can only speculate and that is all this is, that another PR disaster on television should be avoided. GM and Chrysler have done a lot but of course the unions balked.  Compared to the stimulus bill of $787 B the few billion it would take to help here is not a lot.

    We are talking a sort of govt sponsored bankruptcy forcing bondholders and unions to take less. But the govt will have to provide cash for GM Chrysler to stay in business they are tapped out at the banks.

    Markets are opening lower and Dow is testing previous lows.

  • Professor Elam

    Jim Rogers (Investment Biker, Hot Commodities, jimrogers.com) never minces words, here he holds forth on the current plans of Tsy Secy Geithner.

    (separate interview)

     

    Hostess:  Jim, Wall Street is saying Mr.
    Geithner’s plan is a bomb.  What do
    you think?

     

    Rogers:  Well, Mr. Geithner has been bombing for
    fifteen years.  Mr. Geithner caused
    this problem.  Mr. Geithner has
    been head of the New York Fed for several years.  That was the office that was supposed to be symbolizing Wall
    Street and the banking system.  He
    caused the problem…and all last year, he came up with TARP…he came up with
    these absurd bailouts.  Mr.
    Geithner has never known what he’s doing. 
    And pretty soon everybody’s going to find out including Mr. Obama.

     

    Hostess:  How do you assign value to all these
    toxic assets…?

     

    Rogers:  All right, the way you do this is you
    do what America told Japan to do in the nineties.  You let them go bankrupt.  You clean out the system.  You wipe out everybody out who is insolvent, and the solvent
    people take over and start over. 
    In the 1990s Mr. Greenspan went to Japan and said, “You’re doing it
    wrong.  You’ve got to let people go
    bankrupt.  You’ve got to clean out
    the system.”  The Japanese didn’t
    do it.  They continued to prop up
    zombie companies and zombie banks, and they still talk about the lost
    decade.  Mr. Geithner was
    supposedly in Japan in the 1990s. 
    You know what he said the other day?  I almost fell on the floor.  He said, “The Japanese didn’t spend enough money.”  Balderdash, the Japanese did nothing
    but spend money, and at the same time they refused to clean out the banking
    system.  America is making exactly
    the same mistake.  The politicians
    are making it worse, not better. 
    You know why?  They want to
    support their friends on Wall Street, so they can all keep their Masaretis or
    Ferraries, or whatever they’re driving.

     

    Lorie:  Jim, let me get in here with
    something.  There are no bad
    banks…they’re not coming out with…

     

    Rogers:  What do you mean no bad banks?  They’re not letting people fail…and
    what the Swedish did…they said, “OK, put your bad assets over here, keep the
    good assets here, then we start over, and those of you who still have some good
    assets can revive.  The Swedes at
    lease did that.  But the idea that
    the US government is going to buy these toxic assets…whose going to set the
    price, Lorie?  Either the banks
    are, and they’re going to set it too high and the taxpayers are going to lose
    out, or they’re going to set it too low and it’s not going to work.  It never has worked.  This approach has never worked, Lorie.

     

    Lorie:  But to play the devil’s advocate, we
    could go ahead without the bad banks, and let some of these banks fail.

     

    Rogers:  Who?  Who are they going to let fail?  I haven’t seen anything…They put out 350 billion dollars last
    year, and they all continued to pay their dividends, and their bonuses.  Who failed?  You don’t fail when you continue to pay out dividends or
    bonuses with the government’s money.

     

    Lorie:  Jim, you
    probably heard Bill Gross’s commentary this morning which said, unless we get
    more government funding, we’re in for a second wave of a global crisis.  He began drawing up a term
    “mini-depression” as a risk.

     

    Rogers:  If we do get more money we’re going to
    have a depression.
      Mr. Gross has got it exactly wrong.  It doesn’t do any good to take money
    from over here…either print, borrow or tax…and put money over here.  Of course the guys over here love it
    that you are doing that, but it weakens the whole system.  It has never worked.  Go back and look at what has worked in
    history.  Look at what South Korea
    did, or Russia or Mexico.  The
    countries that took their pain…it was horrible pain for a year or two, but then
    they came out of it, and every one of those countries became rapidly growing,
    sound economies for several years. 
    The countries which did it our way never came out of it until a long,
    long time later, if ever.  I’m just
    telling you what has happened and what hasn’t happened, and what has worked in
    the past, and what hasn’t worked.

     

    Lorie:  Don’t mince words, Jim, don’t beat
    around the bush.  What did you want
    to hear from Geithner yesterday?

     

    Rogers:  I would have loved for Mr. Geithner to
    have said, “Listen, guys, we’re in a serious problem.  We didn’t cause the problem…”  Actually he did cause the problem.  Mr. Obama could have said, “To make up for a lot of excesses
    over the last ten years, the people are going to suffer…we have umbrellas, we
    have safety nets.  We will do our
    best to help all of you who are affected by all of this, but it’s going to be
    tough for a couple of years.  Don’t
    worry, America will come out of this in the end if we increase our savings, if
    we increase our investments, everything will be fine.  But,what they did was come out and say, “Look we have a
    horrible problem of too much debt and too much consumption and too much
    borrowing.  You know what we’re
    going to do?  We’re going to go
    deeper into debt and consume more.

     

    Lorie:  Are you making money here?

     

    Rogers:  Am I making money here?  I’m selling short here again.  I covered most of my shorts back in the
    fall, but I’ve been shorting again because I can see these guys don’t know what
    they’re doing.

     

    Lorie:  Shorting what?

     

    Rogers:  IBM, GE, JP Morgan…you know, same old
    companies

     

    Lorie:  Jim, thanks for your time.  Always fun talking to you.  Thanks for your insight.

     

     

     

  • Professor Elam

    This op ed piece in the WSJ

    makes it clear the economy looks like 1082. The continued comparisons to the Great Depression are inaccurate and only fueling less and less confidence.  Indeed we had more banks go broke in Odessa Midland in the late 1980s than have gone broke in the US this year.

    Time to stop campaigning and start governing.

  • Professor Elam

    I just discovered that your comments on the blog are

    not coming ot my account  on att.net but on tamuk.edu

    and that they are all coming in as spam, I can recover them no problem  but I have to look at the spam account, so there you are!  Anyway I posted some replies and you will see more in the future

    I will be making a presentation on the blog as a education innovation at our Southwest Learning Conference to be held here     March 27      \

    I am open to your constructive suggestions on what I might do, how this should be implemented in the overall learning paradigm, linked to the class, whatver, you will not hurt your grade by telling me what you constructively think, I apprecaite the comments posted as it lets me know what yoyu are thinking and what is important to you. AS I have mentioned in class, I was perturbed at teh lack of links to the real world in my own college career, this is my attempt to fill; that void.

    Thanks for your contributions                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

  • Professor Elam

    Congress has excoriated business for various perks and high salaries. The criticism is that business execs look after themselves before the company, indeed that often appears to be the case though I have not seen it in the auto business. 

    BUt when it comes time to vote on a stimulus bill, Congress did the same thing, many put in every pork barrel project their constituents want back home. Why, so they can claim they brought home the bacon for their District.  Gee isn't that just like the business execs looking after themselves first?  Just wondering.
  • Professor Elam

    Last night I we were treated to photos of the debris of  US and Soviet satellites falling to earth. 

    Gee how big is space, what are the sizes of satellites, what is the probability that will happen?

    Now this morning we have news that a British and French nuclear powered nuclear armed subs have collided in the 

    Atlantic Ocean. Given the electronic navigation systems on these ships, well, outliers and Black Swans do happen don't they?

  • Professor Elam

    One alert student points out that  UTSA is going to enter the football arena in the next year or two. 

    Indeed the Presidents and alums of various large enrollment state schools in Texas look dreamily to Austin and visions of millions in athletic revenue dance in their heads.  Well as University of North Texas, actually a Division 1A school now, have discovered, it ain't that simple. Large enrollment does not translate to instant large athletic success.  As George Will noted a few years back, there are only about 35 colleges in the USA that can qualify for genuine televised end of the season bowl playing status. And the rest, well, one need only examine Texas State, University of North Texas or University of Houston to see the results.  If large enrollment instantly translated into athletic success, Alamo Community College District with over 50,000 enrolled, would play in the Rose Bowl!