• Professor Elam

    Weekend Feb 4 2023

    Patrick Danner, reporter at SA Express News has uncovered yet another book keeper fraud.

    Meet Monica Marie Padilla

    2/3/2023 by Patrick Danner SA Express news

    Monica Marie Padilla has a checkered past.

    Over the course of two decades, the 45-year-old San Antonio woman has been accused of forging checks, theft and fraudulently possessing someone’s identification.

    That hasn’t stopped her from finding work and gaining her bosses’ confidence, though.

    Roger and Amber Gilbert, owners of Superior Fence Co. of San Antonio, hired Padilla in June 2021 to handle payroll, pay bills and reconcile company books. They say they gave her access to company checking accounts, credit and debit cards, and bookkeeping records — even their personal banking and financial information.

    The married couple is ruing her hire.

    The Gilberts allege that Padilla rewarded their trust by a creating a payment scheme to embezzle almost $380,000 during her nine months on the job. Superior Fence is suing to try to recover the allegedly stolen money.

    “I don’t know anything about it,” Padilla said when reached by phone last week. “I didn’t get any lawsuit or anything.”

    She hung up when asked about her previous scrapes with the law. It’s a history that illustrates how an employee can be accused of stealing, charged in court — even sentenced to jail — and keep landing jobs that provide access to companies’ financial information.

    On ExpressNews.com: San Antonio architecture firm alleges ex-bookkeeper embezzled almost $1.7 million

    The ever-expanding gallery of bookkeepers and office managers accused of stealing from their employers shows it’s not uncommon. Some of the recent cases:

    • Daniella Zuniga Vasquez, who was arrested in October and accused of stealing more than $150,000 from San Antonio homebuilder Bellaire-Hagen, which does business as Bellaire Homes, after about six months on the job. She confessed to police, Bellaire says in a lawsuit against Vasquez and her husband to recover the money. It obtained default judgments against both after they didn’t answer the suit. Vasquez, 45, has not been indicted.
    • Sarah Lingle, who Alamo Heights’ Sage Architecture alleges in a September lawsuit stole almost $1.7 million. Lingle, 38, has not answered the lawsuit and has not been charged with any crimes, though the U.S. Secret Service has been investigating.
    • Alicia Henderson, also known as Alicia Padilla, 60, is serving a 33-month federal prison sentence for embezzling $291,000 from Centro San Antonio, a public-private nonprofit created to help beautify downtown. She pleaded guilty in 2020 to charges of wire fraud and making a false statement on an income tax return and was sentenced in August.
    • Barbara Chalmers, 74, of Lewisville recently pleaded guilty to embezzling at least $29 million from a charitable foundation and several other companies run by a Dallas family. She wrote herself more than 175 checks from the companies’ bank accounts and used more than $25 million to fund a construction company she headed, the Justice Department said. She faces up to 10 years in federal prison.

    This is a carousel. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate

  • Professor Elam

    Weekend Feb 4 2023

     

    My friends at Elliott Wave Intl believe we are at the anniversary of a Grand Supercycle High last seen in  1720. That period was the occasion of John Law's Mississippi Scheme and in France and the South Sea Bubble in England, all detailed in Harvey McKay's book.

    Here are some links to read the stories.

    htJohn Law, economist

    Origin and End of the Mississippi Company

    Rise and Fall of the South Sea Company in England

    hTulipmania Bubble of 1634

  • Professor Elam

    Thursday Feb 2 2023

    IIA Call to Action
    Stop the PCAOB Attack on Internal Audit

    On December 22, 2022, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) published, for
    public comment, a proposed auditing standard entitled: “
    The Auditor’s Use of Confirmation, and
    Other Proposed Amendments to PCAOB Standards
    .”
    The proposed standard, in relevant part, bars external auditors from utilizing an internal audit
    function to provide direct assistance in the confirmation process (selecting, sending and receiving
    confirmations).

    The IIA encourages all chapter leaders and members to request their employer and/or board of
    directors submit a public comment letter to the PCAOB supporting the internal audit profession and
    opposing this change.

    If your employer is unable or unwilling to send a letter, we ask that you seek permission from your
    employer to send a letter in your own capacity as an internal auditor.

    Such a letter is intended to provide objective support for the internal audit profession from relevant
    stakeholders. The letter should focus, in part, on the following themes:

    o General and/or specific examples of the contributions an internal audit function brings to an
    organization

    o Stress that internal auditors provide boards of directors and/or audit committees with
    objective assurance that is independent from management

    o Reiterate that internal auditors are required to comply with mandatory professional standards
    and a code of ethics

    o Highlight the fact that internal auditors and external auditors maintain the same reporting
    relationship to an organization’s audit committee

    o Call for the PCAOB to continue with its existing standard,
    AS 2605, which allows external
    auditors to assess internal auditors for objectivity and competence and then decide whether
    or not to seek the assistance of the internal audit function

    Stakeholders may also utilize the enclosed onepager as an additional resource in developing
    language refuting the PCAOB’s assertions. The document contains more information on the proposed
    rule and outlines key characteristics of internal audit seemingly neglected by the PCAOB. Please do
    not use the text verbatim. Rather, place the message in your own words.

    The IIA will host a virtual meeting with chapter leadership/members on February 9, 2023, at 3:00
    PM EST to further review the process for obtaining an employer letter of support.

    o If you are interested in participating in the IIA’s virtual meeting, please register your
    attendance by clicking
    here.

     
     
     

    Public comment letters drafted in support of the internal audit profession must be submitted to the
    PCAOB via the
    online rulemaking docket or by email at comments@pcaobus.org (referencing “PCAOB
    Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 028). Public comments are due no later than February 20,
    2023.

    Please also send a copy of any external PCAOB letters of

  • Professor Elam

    Thursday Feb 2 2023

    Chris Pettit's Office buiilding sells for $2.2 M to local doctor.

    We have been following the bankruptcy case of accused swindler Atty Chris Pettit who is now in jail, make that former Atty he surrendered his law license.

     

  • Professor Elam

    Wed Feb 1 2023

     

    The SEC is always too littlt too late

  • Professor Elam

    Wed Feb 1 2023

    Screen Shot 2023-02-01 at 10.52.28 AM

     

     

  • Professor Elam

    Tuesday Jan 31 2023

    7 Audit Procedures

     

    Be proud and say it loud if you’re an auditor, because unlike many journalists and political leaders, we can back up what we say with evidence! Auditors can be trusted to tell the truth. Hallelujah!

    But how do we gather this convincing, truthful evidence? We can use one of seven types of audit procedures:

    1. Inspection. Here we look at records, documents or physical assets to prove or disprove a statement or an assertion by the auditee. For instance, if we want to prove a payment was made to a vendor, we could look at a bank statement (a document either on paper or online) and find the check number, date and payment amount.
    2. Observation. Here we watch a process or event occurring. For instance, if you want to prove recently laid-off employees are receiving job training offered through a state program, you could sit in on one of the classes and note how many students are in attendance.
    3. External Confirmation. Here we ask an objective third-party to verify that something occurred. For instance, your auditee might show you an engineer’s report to confirm they cleaned up a hazardous waste site. Since engineering reports can be forged, you contact the engineering company to confirm they did indeed create the document.
    4. Recalculation. Here the auditor runs the numbers themselves ensuring the formulas and calculations were applied correctly by the auditee. For instance, the auditee may have reported a specific dollar figure for police officers’ overtime pay. To verify the dollar figure, the auditor calculates the overtime pay based on pay rates and hours then compares the auditor’s result to the auditee’s figure.
      audit procedure
      Recalculation is one of the 7 common audit procedures.
    5. Reperformance. Here the auditor verifies the auditee’s procedures by performing the procedures themselves. For instance, if the auditee asserts a password is necessary to access critical data, the auditor will try to access the data with and without the password.
    6. Analytical Procedures. Here the auditor manipulates data to show trends or patterns. For instance, the auditor might sort all purchasing card transactions by user to find out who uses the card most often and for what purposes.
    7. Inquiry. Here the auditor asks questions of the auditee or another party. The answers to the questions are considered testimonial evidence, which is more credible and convincing if it comes from someone other than the auditee.

    The AICPA and GAO command auditors to describe the ‘nature’ of a procedure in audit documentation. Adding these seven to the description of your audit procedure will fulfill that command.

  • Professor Elam

    Monday Jan 30 2023

    San Antonio Chapter

    We've been having tech issues with the chapter home page in getting the February meeting set up to accept registrations.  Just as soon as we get that resolved, we'll let you know.  

    For now, please keep open Wednesday, February 15th, 5:30-8pm CT in person & 6-8pm CT virtual.  

    We will also be announcing at least one new annual sponsor to help underwrite our student scholarships.

    In addition to CMA Recognition Night for all of the chapter's CMA's (as we have done the last few years), we will have 2 great topics this month for 2 hours of CPE:

    Alexandra Graham from Gleim is going to talk about "CMA – Professional Value & Exam Content, Structure and Success Strategies."  (If you have ever wondered what the CMA could do for you or a colleague and what's involved in the process, this is for you!  Bring a guest with you!)

    Learning objectives & Category:  To Be Announced
    Pre-requisites:  None

    Kelly Kljajic-Powers recently announced Director of Business Development with Badger CPAs is going to talk about "Hiring Trends, Retention and Burnout."  

    Learning objectives & Category:  To Be Announced
    Pre-requisites:  None

    – Mike Lovelace, CMA
    VP, Member Engagement

  • Professor Elam

    Weekend Jan 29 2023

     

    Emerson Central

    https://emersoncentral.com/

     

    Emerson Society

    https://emersonsociety.org/

  • Professor Elam

    Thursday Jan 26 2023

    The modern horror movie appeared amid the 1930s Depression, Dracula played in formal attire, Frankenstein and the Wolf Man paralleled the fear of the Depression.

    These horror movies returned in the downturn of the  19+70s  with the Exorcist, the most horrifying movie ever made, bragged the tag line.

    gangster movies were allso poppular in the  1930s with titles like Public Enemy. The Godfather twin movies enlarged on that theme in the  1970s. In the sub prime meltdown 2008 we had Public Enemies.

    the word permanent caught my attention, never mind the  1930s or 1970s, the future will be horror all the time!
     
     
     
    Here is San Antonio two former Fiesta Kings appear to be involve in multi million dollar contract fraud