Exxon’s 2007 Tax Bill: $30 Billion
Mark J. Perry, PhD | February 05, 2008
Corporate profits receive a lot of media attention, but what receives considerably less attention are the corporate taxes paid on corporate profits. Do a Google search for “Exxon profits” and you’ll get about 8,000 hits. Now try “Exxon taxes” and you’ll get a little more than 300 hits. That’s a ratio of about 33 to 1.
I’m pretty sure that Exxon’s tax payment in 2007 of $30 billion (that’s $30,000,000,000) is a record, exceeding the $28 billion it paid last year.
By the way, Exxon pays taxes at a rate of 41% on its taxable income!
[Update: The $40.6 billion and $39.5 billion figures are after-tax profits. For 2006, Exxon’s EBT (earnings before tax) was $67.4 billion, it paid $27.9 billion in taxes (41.4% tax rate), and its NIAT (net income after tax), or profit, was $39.5 billion.]
Over the last three years, Exxon Mobil has paid an average of $27 billion annually in taxes. That’s $27,000,000,000 per year, a number so large it’s hard to comprehend. Here’s one way to put Exxon’s taxes into perspective.
According to IRS data for 2004, the most recent year available:
· Total number of tax returns: 130 million
· Number of Tax Returns for the Bottom 50%: 65 million
· Adjusted Gross Income for the Bottom 50%: $922 billion
· Total Income Tax Paid by the Bottom 50%: $27.4 billion
Conclusion: In other words, just one corporation (Exxon Mobil) pays as much in taxes ($27 billion) annually as the entire bottom 50% of individual taxpayers, which is 65,000,000 people! Further, the tax rate for the bottom 50% is only 3% of adjusted gross income ($27.4 billion / $922 billion), and the tax rate for Exxon was 41% in 2006 ($67.4 billion in taxable income, $27.9 billion in taxes).
Dr. Mark J. Perry is a professor of economics and finance in the School of Management at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan. ###
Dennis Elam Observation
Okay so what did the US Govt do with $27 B x 3 = $81 B?
Are we more energy independent? Did someone create a nandy solar adjunct water heater so we could all save money on heating bills? Have they worked with car companies or tried to engage an urban planing strategy to allow for more rail or high mileage ultralights (my Kawasaki Mule for the street idea) in suburban neighborhoods? No, none of that! We are no closer to energy independence than we ever were!
Now suppose Exxon had been able to keep even half that money to work on energy research,
who do you think would show more results at the end of the day, Washington or Exxon?
I await your comments on the blog….
Leave a reply to Lhamu Cancel reply