As usualTom Sowell cuts through the rhetorical clutter. I would add that Greenspan's way too low interest rates and the Bush policy of build build houses added to the mess.

At any rate, we have, surprise, the foreign exchnges pretty much bouncing back to even after an initial sell off last night, I would have thougth they would be down further.  Perhaps that is a vote for the idea that we need a better bailout bill?

While no one wants to try to 'catch a falling knife ( the danger of buying a market in panic, where is the bottom) this also illustrates an interesting point.  Baron von Rothschild observed that one must buy when there is 'blood in the streets' he meant that literally, revolution brings great values, if of course one picks the winning side…

Are there winners you would like to own in the middle of this panic, SKT, the outlet mall hardly budged yesterday, pipeline stocks are down but above previous lows, the transport ETF IYT has pulled back to support at its 200 day moving average, buy and hold, panic out of positions?  Fun fun and a whole four days of trading to go.

This is why we study accounting and finance, we need to understand the language and statements of companies. We also need to understand the psychology of markets which is why I highlight technical analysis and psychologic studies like Elliott Wave and Socionomics.

Socionomics is the  idea that events are shaped by human emotions. The best laboratory of those emotions on display is the stockmarket, this week is a case in point. At Dow 14,000 pop culture was happy and buying, today the culture is unhappy and selling. 

Words matter, someone on tv just made the point that the word BAILOUT is a negative connotation, cleraly the people are NOT for a bailout.

A bounce back in the markets is expected, though I am buoyed that the foreign markets did not close down last night.  I doubt the low is in quite yet but I expect to see at least a near term low this week.

Irony of the Week While eveyrone recoiled at the idea of a $700 B bailout, more than $1.2 trillion exited our markets just yesterday, way to go Congress….

Posted in

4 responses to “Tuesday, A Whole Week of Volatility Left!”

  1. Yovela Rico Avatar
    Yovela Rico

    It seems like all the politicians are thinking I, I, I and not about what’s better for US but, they did get a lot of heat for going along with Bush in the War and perhaps they are a bit reserved at what their next decision will cost them. If we elected the right people they, shouldn’t care about the cost to their reputations and should only be concerned about the cost to that nation. Overall, I think people are a little less likely to jump in the boat with him this time around.

    Like

  2. Isabel Amesquita Avatar
    Isabel Amesquita

    I agree with the term socionomics. Many people are looking for someone to say we are going to be okay. With all the negative media and not passing the bill we are not to far from panic. There is a mixture of emotions including fear, anger, and anxiety. How long before people start going to the banks and pulling their money out?

    Like

  3. Dennis Elam Avatar
    Dennis Elam

    actually I think the people are NOT in panic mode, the politicians are, okay maybe money is tight but we were told just last week the world would end this week if the bill did not pass, the thing failed at least once and gee we are all working while congress is still dithering
    It is ocming out that paulson just pulled the $700 B number out of thin air, this is a rejection of wall street, interestingly the Black Caucus voted against this bill, one might thienk their group would benefit, apparently that is not their view
    Even Michael Moore is against this as a wall street bailout, for once I agree with him!
    dle

    Like

  4. Dennis Elam Avatar
    Dennis Elam

    passing the bill is simply a way to hand out money to various interest groups from Acorn to Wall Street, it is trulyu all about them, a contrived panic before the election

    Like

Leave a reply to Yovela Rico Cancel reply