From Neal Boortz, author of The Fair Tax

one student on the blog thinks he govt should regulate oil prices, okay you may get your wish….

OBAMA'S NEW REGULATIONS

By

Neal Boortz

@ June 17, 2009 8:38 AM Permalink | Comments (39) | TrackBacks (0)

Today is the day that Barack Obama unveils his plans for one of the most radical growths in government this country has ever seen. Obama's plan will give the government the power to seize companies that are considered "too big to fail" and could jeopardize the financial system. We aren't just talking about banks, folks. We are talking about ANY company.

OK … I can't let this pass. Over a week ago, when Obama was first promoting his executive compensation limitations, I told you that it would be no time at all before Mr. Government Control was expanding his ideas to companies his administration deemed to be "too big to fail." Thus far Hugo Obama hasn't actually used the "too big to fail" language. Instead we are hearing things about companies who's failure, as the Lost Angeles Times puts it, "jeopardizes the financial system." As determined by who? As determined by Obama's henchmen, of course. Now … here we are. Just how hard was that one to predict? Why, not hard at all, actually.

This is what our country has come to. Our Founding Fathers are rolling over right now at the thought that our imperial federal government will soon have the power to seize virtually any company that it wants. All we have to do is get some government hack, like our tax-cheat Treasury Secretary, to say that the failure of this company would be bad news for our economy … and that the government needs to take it over. And Obama gets upset when he hears people refer to him as a Socialist. How sad.

Think all of this over for a second. Medicare. Medicaid. Social Security. Welfare Housing. Veteran's Administration hospitals. TSA. Homeland Security. Look at all the enterprises our wonderful Imperial Federal Government operates? Do you really think that the government operates any of these entities more efficiently than the private sector could? And now we are going to sit back while Barack Obama sets up a system where he can seize pretty much any company he wants so long as he can make some argument that the failure of that company would be troublesome.

While we're at it, why not go ahead and create another government agency? You really can't have enough government, can you? Obama's new regulatory body will be called the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. An administration official says that the agency will "protect consumers of credit, savings, payment and other consumer financial products and services, and to regulate all providers of such products and services." It will have the authority to write and enforce rules for financial firms. This agency will enforce so-called "fair lending" laws. Yeah … that will work. Can't wait until we find out what the government seems to think is "fair."

Douglas J. Elliott, an economics fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former investment banker says, "As far as I can tell, the administration doesn't think it's as important to get that structure right as to get the rules right and make sure people are focused on acting the right way."

Acting the right way. Now government will be the one to determine whether or not these businesses are "acting the right way."

Could you have imagined when this last presidential election cycle started that we were going to end up with an administration that would be hell-bent on placing private businesses under government ownership? There were some people around who were warning you about that. They're called talk show hosts.

Elections have consequences.

Posted in

5 responses to “Govt Knows Who is too Big to Fail”

  1. Felix Duque Avatar
    Felix Duque

    I agree with the last paragraph you posted. I think that one of the biggest problems was that we are too stubborn to realize that this time a Woman would have been the better choice… ring any bells? Yes, I am talking about Hillary Clinton. No I am not going crazy, I think that she had the ace up her sleeve, because she had Bill Clinton’s experience at her disposal.
    Then again that is only my opinion 😉

    Like

  2. Adam Dupnik Avatar
    Adam Dupnik

    I would rather they just limit how big a company get get in the first place, and make harsher punishments for falisfying reports or cooking the books. Like it is referenced in manias panics and crashes, if we can limit how big bubbles get maybe the crashes will not be as hard.
    but hey who knows

    Like

  3. Dennis Elam Avatar
    Dennis Elam

    It is always too late once we realize the report is false
    This is simply too much power in the hands of govt that is easily lobbied.

    Like

  4. brad phillips Avatar

    Hey I’m all for Goverment intervention in the event of “Market Failures”, but this is going a little to far. This is like squashing a tin can with a sledge hammer…
    I dont think the Government should be able to limit a company’s size, but do feel there should be better enforcements in regulating the manipulation of finacial statements.
    America was founded on capatalism, and I feel that the current leadership is taking that away from us peice by peice.
    I dont want to go to an extreme, but The great thing about capatilism is the ability of competition to drive progress, and when the goverment steps in, they cease that competition. Simply I’ll say, less is best!
    http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism

    Like

  5. Dennis Elam Avatar
    Dennis Elam

    Okayh students you tell me,
    appliances.com wasd ok for failure as was Packard Motor Cars
    Bank depositors are routinely paid up to 100 K and now a hiugher limit but Bear Stearns was ‘saved’ but a former Golamdn partner Paulson deicded not to save Lehman, WHY, this is not mentioned as leading to the big problems of the fall
    Now it ogets truly worrisome, how is the govt picking and choosing which chrysler and GM dealers get to stay, is there political party affiliation part of the equation? If GM Chrsler are just jobs programs anyway, clearly we have too many car manufacturers for the market for the forseeable future, why not let them all stay, after all it employs people in towns across America? Every day I see another family on tv wanting to know why their dealership in business for decades got cancelled
    No one saved Wang, Control Data, Digital Equip DEC, University Computing (one student asked for more computer posts), ever heard of those guys, all either merged or gone
    Now Barack is openly complaining about his coverage on the Fox tv network, gee the others all fall all over themselves about him, is the Fox license in jeopardy as a result?

    Like

Leave a reply to Adam Dupnik Cancel reply