Wednesday before Black Friday Nov 21 2012

I have posted some or part of Ralph Waldo Emerson's famous essay on gifts the last several Christmas seasons. He wrote these essays from 1830-32. Note the relevance of the first two sentences. Tmes change, people do not. The only gift is a portion of thyself, it is a cold lifeless business when you go to a shop to buy me something, well put Waldo. 

 

"Gifts"
By Ralph Waldo Emerson.

IT is said that the world is in a state of bankruptcy, that the world owes the world more than the world can pay, and ought to go into chancery, and be sold. I do not think this general insolvency, which involves in some sort all the population, to be the reason of the difficulty experienced at Christmas and New Year, and other times, in bestowing gifts; since it is always so pleasant to be generous, though very vexatious to pay debts. But the impediment lies in the choosing. If, at any time, it comes into my head that a present is due from me to somebody, I am puzzled what to give, until the opportunity is gone. Flowers and fruits are always fit presents; flowers, because they are a proud assertion that a ray of beauty outvalues all the utilities of the world. These gay natures contrast with the somewhat stern countenance of ordinary nature: they are like music heard out of a workhouse. Nature does not cocker us: we are children, not pets: she is not fond: everything is dealt to us without fear or favour, after severe universal laws. Yet these delicate flowers look like the frolic and interference of love and beauty. Men use to tell us that we love flattery, even though we are not deceived by it, because it shows that we are of importance enough to be courted. Something like that pleasure the flowers give us: what ant I to whom these sweet hints are addressed? Fruits are acceptable gifts because they are the flower of commodities, and admit of fantastic values being attached to them. If a man should send to me to come a hundred miles to visit him, and should set before me a basket of fine summer fruit, I should think there was some proportion between the labour and the reward.

For common gifts, necessity makes pertinences and beauty every day, and one is glad when an imperative leaves him no option, since if the man at the door have no shoes, you have not to consider whether you could procure him a paint-box. And as it is always pleasing to see a man eat bread, or drink water, in the house or out of doors, so it is always a great satisfaction to supply these first wants. Necessity does everything well. In our condition of universal dependence, it seems heroic to let the petitioner be the judge of his necessity, and to give all that is asked, though at great inconvenience. If it be a fantastic desire, it is better to leave to others the office of punishing him. I can think of many parts I should prefer playing to that of the Furies. Next to things of necessity, the rule for a gift which one of my friends prescribed is, that we might convey to some person that which properly, belonged to his character, and was easily associated with him in thought. But our tokens of compliment and love are for the most part barbarous. Rings and other jewels are not gifts, but apologies for gifts. The only gift is a portion of thyself. Thou must bleed for me. Therefore the poet brings his poem; the shepherd, his lamb; the farmer, corn; the miner, a gem; the sailor, coral and shells; the painter, his picture; the girl, a handkerchief of her own sewing. This is right and pleasing, for it restores society in so far to the primary basis, when a man's biography is conveyed in his gift, and every man's wealth is an index of his merit. But it is a cold, lifeless business when you go to the shops to buy me something, which does not represent your life and talent, but a goldsmith's. This is fib for kings, and rich men who represent kings, and a false state of property, to make presents of gold and silver stuffs, as a kind of symbolical sin-offering, or payment of black mail.

Posted in

3 responses to “Emerson on Gifts”

  1. Edna Avatar
    Edna

    From my understanding gifts should be given and received with knowing the identity of the giver. For the past several years I have tried to convince my family that we should no longer exchange gifts. We should instead get the money we would spend and donate items to a family that is less fortunate that we are. Here it is 2012 and no such luck. Names have been exchanged and wish lists have been distributed to the family. With much disappointment the majority of gifts listed on the wish list is Visa gift card, Best Buy, Sears or Academy in other words all gift cards. The family exchange of gifts does not identify the person giving because they are walking into a department store purchasing a gift card. I tell them there is no thought or personal feeling going into the purchase. If that is the case we should just keep our money because that is all that is being exchanged. I’m the only family member out of about 30 that likes the excitement of not knowing what my gift is. My gift is not an exchange of cash or credit for a gift card. My gift is chosen with thought and from the heart.

    Like

  2. Linda McCormick Avatar
    Linda McCormick

    As a child I experienced the joy of receiving. As a parent I experienced the joy of giving to my children. Now they are grown. I don’t need anything, nor do they want anything. Christmas had become an exchange of gift cards. So we are choosing some less fortunate than us that have the basis needs of life that clearly appreciate what a difference a gift in their life can mean. It may not be the true meaning of giving, but certainly a better feeling about giving.

    Like

  3. Shopping Info Avatar

    It’s going to be finish of mine day, but before end I am reading this fantastic article to improve my experience.

    Like

Leave a reply to Shopping Info Cancel reply